GIVE ENERGY BACK.
Most of our webs are free, although many people think the information they contain is worth Nobel Prices, and really can make a difference.
If you want us to continue, and can help us, please donate, by a kind click on button below.
Thank you very much indeed.

BR>

LEON RAOUL HATEM will now talk with you about that.

YOU: Please, Mr ATOM... Sorry: HATEM, what is "The Big Bang" theory?

Léon Raoul HATEM: Nobody really knows what it was: A supposed huge explosion of all available matter (or energy), concentrated in one point, supposed to provide the universe with all its movement, atoms and stars. It's considered to be the best hypothesis to explain the huge amount of energy required to move stars and planets. Pieces of exploding " something " allegedly were launched in space about 15 BILLION YEARS AGO, giving rise to atoms.

You may have noticed that heat is, in fact, a result of the concentration and MOTIONS of atoms, and that as long as there are no atoms, there can be no heat. Physicists do not know what heat is, and imagine that heat exists in its own right. If there had been a concentration of everything somewhere, motion would have been impossible, there would have been no friction at all, and it would have been absolutely cold. As long as physicists fail to demonstrate that heat exists without atoms, I cannot believe in any original explosion due to initial heat. We know that heat comes from compressed atoms. So, for there to be heat, atoms must already exist. However, the Big Bang theory does not explain where the atoms and the matter come from.

YOU : Do you have the answer?

L. R. H. : If there were none, I would not be here talking with you. There is no heat at the beginning. The Zero-Point is NOTHINGNESS. And creation takes place at each present moment. Not in the past once and for all, but at every moment. The principles we shall explain later generate instants of infinite mind, and this mind is obliged to reduce itself to concentrated forms which are " particles ". This takes place without time, outside of time. Time starts when motions start, and they start slowly and quietly at their scale, in accordance with some still-unknown (in Earth's universities) magnetic laws. We will explain all of this later. At our scale, we cannot see this. It is too quick to be perceived. It is immediate. But the whole universe re-creates itself at each moment within mind, each time a little different.

It is not possible to sum this up now. Please be patient.

An explosion of matter in the past is a childish idea. It becomes stupid if, at the same time, it is supposed to create millions of galaxies with billions of little birds singing in the trees.

YOU: Surely, a " God " willing to create life would be better qualified. A smiling little bird is a strange result for an explosion.

L. R. H.: In fact, from an explosion or anything sudden, only DEGRADATION is possible. Not improvement or increasing complexity. So, if a "big bang" had happened, surely it would have been much more intelligent, good-looking and fuller of love than we are now.

Without a deep and strong " will " within " matter " and " energy " to live and to evolve, it is impossible to explain anything. Even a single atom cannot be the result of chance. Too many conditions are necessary for it to be.

YOU: Atoms are supposed to be born out of the explosion, but Quantum Physics says that they are made niether of particles of matter nor of movement. Only of numbers. What, then, is the purpose of the explosion? Is it an explosion of probabilities ?

L. R. H.: The only real " big bang " is the revolution in thought that knowledge can bring forth. The universe is not an expolsion of " matter " outside the " zero-point ", but an implosion of intelligence and love INSIDE the nil-point. The " Big Bang " theory was invented because of some supposed expansion of the universe; thus Abbé Lemaître imagined that it was more concentrated in the past, and the discovery of nuclear explosion made some physicists think that a concentration of matter could have exploded. If atoms were formed before, to generate heat and the explosion, then we will have to find another explanation for the origin of the universe, because this theory appears to be only the description of a change in the distribution of atoms. So, it's redundant. And if atoms were not already formed, then it must explain their coming into existence. Even if an explosion were responsible for some revolving motions in the sky, it would be absolutely incapable of providing particles with reasons to spin and remain in their orbits for billions of years... In order to create bigger masses also spinning and revolving! The Big Bang theory wasn't invented to explain atoms, and it can't explain them. So, it doesn't explain the universe at all.

And there is another reason why that theory is useless : In fact, an explosion is necessary only if you believe that atoms and planets consume energy in order to move at their incredible speeds. But they don't. Their motive energy is created all the time by their magnetic relations between one another, derived from a cause we will explain later. So, no colossal primary push, coming from any explosion, is required.

YOU: But the Big Bang was invented according to actual observations. The expansion of stars, the background light and its disparities, the range of mineral elements, where helium atoms are too numerous...

Doesn't the expanding universe confirm that it was concentrated a billion years ago?
L. R. H.: First of all, it's impossible to be sure that the whole universe is expanding, instead of just the part of it in which our galaxy takes place. Secondly, the expansion is supposed to occur according to the interpretation of the apparent shift of the stars' spectrum towards red. Since physicists know the Doppler effect, which shifts waves according to your position and the motion of the source, they interpreted this shift of light in the same terms. But it does not mean that this is so. Maybe it is a matter of evolution. The farther you look in space, the earlier you see in time, where the universe is less evolved. The colours you see depend on the wave length, which depends on the acceleration of motion from the beginning, and on the concentration of energy. So, you must not believe that expansion is a certainty. It is only a hypothesis proved by nothing.
This shift is bigger and bigger the farther you look into the past. If it were an expansion, this would mean that the expansion is faster and faster since the beginning. This is impossible. Where would the increase in speed come from? From what source of energy? After an explosion, motions never speed up.

Our spiritual interpretation is consistent with this observation: the farther you look, the lower the level of evolution; so the shift of the stars' color spectrum of colors is increasingly accentuated.

In any case, this alleged expansion makes this model unable to create a universe : An expansion would be that of all the pieces of matter in all directions from the exploding center. So, how could they encounter other ones in order to make a planetary system? The universe cannot be the result of an expansion, even if there is expansion. And thirdly, there are other reasons why the universe expands. But those reasons are due to rules that scientists are still ignoring, and which explain the "background light", which is supposed to be the residue of the explosion.

YOU: Are you sure that physicists still believe in an explosion of matter? Some now say that it is a boundless field of energy which becomes solid little by little, or that there are many little "bangs" everywhere...

L. R. H.: If physicists stop backing the idea of explosion, there will no longer be a "Big Bang" theory. No bang at all. There will just be Laplace's Nebula. But if there is no explosion, it will be difficult to explain the motions of stars and, most of all, of atomic particles.

And if there are several big bangs, we can imagine whatever we want. A big bang for each star, or a big bang at every moment. In fact, they are obliged to admit, sooner or later, that the origin takes place everywhere at the same time, and at each moment of time, without expansion, and to forget Doppler effect and " background light ".

To really explain a universe, or an infinite number of universes, created at each moment, they will be forced to invent a spiritual theory of "I AM", just as we shall explain it, an eternal source of consciousness and energy which gives rise to the effect of matter, thanks to magnetic energy. If they do not, they will never explain anything. There is no other option.

I do not mean that physicists are stupid. I only think they are afraid of truth. Scientists generally know that the "big bang" theory is impossible. The problem is that they have nothing with which to replace it, it is consistent with the usual mistakes of Physics (but in absolute contradiction to Quantum Physics). So they carry on teaching it.

We will not talk about today's Physics any longer. What is most interesting is to understand the universe. We have everything we need at our disposal for that: we shall explain how to emerge from Nothingness at each moment because of an undisputable AIM ; we shall explain the origin of space and time, and how the effects of matter and particles arise; we shall demonstrate which energy is the only possible energy, and why it creates two-pole concentrations of mind, far from each other, and why they are obliged to start moving without any external intervention. We are going to see the birth of an atom. And when you understand ONE atomic system, you understand the whole mechanics of the whole universe.

YOU: Do you think everybody will be able to understand?

L. R. H.: Of course. It's man's nature that we are going to show. No complication is necessary. The universe is the simplest thing you could imagine. If not, it wouldn't exist. The only complications that exist are those which man himself introduces in order not to understand. And when things become too complicated, he needs Mathematics to bail him out. We never use Mathematics. It is only necessary for technical achievements, not for comprehension. Everything here is concrete and full of life. Mathematics, as taught in Universities, is part of the Universe. It is a consequence of Physics. So it cannot explain the Universe and is of no use to us since our purpose is to show the reality " beyond ", or " before " the physical universe.

The atom is everyone's problem. Everybody must know how an atom works in order to know his own body. THE WHOLE SECRET OF THE UNIVERSE AND OF MAN CAN BE FOUND WITHIN A COUPLE OF MARBLES REVOLVING AROUND EACH OTHER. And it is a wonder. Something absolutely miraculous; incredible: In free space, spheres start turning and revolving and continue for eternity! It is certain that there cannot be two different explanations for that. It is too extraordinary. It is impossible for there to be two theories, one for the sky, and one for the atoms, leading to the same result! Nonsense again. Even if physicists now say that particles do not revolve around nuclei. But their model of the quantum atom cannot account for macrocosmic effects of matter. They are in total confusion, and this leads them to complicate their theories, and each day invent new laws for new phenomena.

YOU: Stephen Hawking said that when the true theory of the universe is discovered, it will be easy to understand, and everybody will be able to talk about it. Do you think that everybody will find your theory easy to understand?

L. R. H.: Not easy but simple. As soon as they get used to a few metaphysical concepts. For there are no mathematics, and only ONE Creative Principle accounting for every phenomenon in the universe. A Creative Principle which of course is present at every point of Infinity, granting every atom its own source of power. This is the only way to explain such a universe: only one source somewhere is nonsense. The Creative Principle we propose is based on three legs in order to give stability to matter: magnetical dualism, harmony (synchronized spins) which produces kinetic energy and generates gravitation, and revolving motion which balances accelerations and produces equilibrium (we say "revolution" or "revolving" when a planet turns around another one, like the Earth around the Sun, and "spin motion" for the turning motion of a planet around its rotation axis: the Earth "spins").

When you understand why those "marbles" are, and why they turn, you understand what you are. Those marbles are stars, planets, but also protons, electrons, your body and your form. To understand our bodies' birth, we shall refer to a little machine which shows us the main principles of universal mechanics.

If you want to read our proposals about the problems we have talked about, you only have to click on the underlined words.